Basically all the good, easy to remember URLs had gone, so I went with this one - "un diario de la motocicleta" (without the spaces), which Google translate (I didn't trust my Spanish at the time) told me was "A motorcycle diary". The reason for calling it this is because:
- It references "The motorcycle diaries" or "Diarios de motocicleta", the story of Ernesto "Che" Guevara, Alberto Granado and their single cylinder Norton 500 bike's eye-opening journey from Buenos Aires to Venezuela, although I seem to recall that the bike didn't make it to the end. I'm starting in a similar place, following a similar route and also riding a big, single cylinder bike. I think the similarities are likely to end there, I'm the other side of 30, am not a medical student hoping to work in a leper colony and don't have ambitions to appear on the walls or T-shirts of (potentially misguided) students. I also don't suggest that I'm the first person to have done this since - hence the use of the indefinite article. (1)
- The title is in Spanish, or at least Spanglish, which is one of the reasons why I'm doing the trip. As such it would be very ironic if it was wrong...
- It will be partly a diary and partly about motorbikes and occasionally (potentially frequently) neither of these things.
- It demonstrates I have a tendency to overthink things, and I'm afraid 8 hours in the saddle looking at the pampas, probably isn't going to help this.
Iain
26/02/2014
Buenos Aires (S: 34° 37.183' W: 58° 23.307')
Post-script (17/4/2014)
Before I left some people had said about the trip - "you could write a book about that". However, this is not a first step at publication, basically because it doesn't meet the criteria necessary for publication (and in some respects I hope it doesn't as that likely means something has gone badly wrong). The more time I spend here the more I realise that there are a lot more people doing this sort of trip than you might think. So, to make a book worth reading (and therefore worth publishing), it needs to be one (or ideally more than one) of the following:
Notes:
1. When I wrote this I hadn't actually read it, I have now. It's a very well written book and he comes across as a pretty mature person apart from the last couple of paragraphs, but that could well have been written at a later stage (the last part of the book is much more fragmented and significantly less coherent than the rest of the book). There's also no reference to his trip to the USA which he did between leaving Venezuela and returning to Buenos Aires. I'd have been interested to see what his perspective of the USA was and the people he met there, or whether he was as prejudiced as he claimed visitors in the opposite direction were.
Post-script (17/4/2014)
Before I left some people had said about the trip - "you could write a book about that". However, this is not a first step at publication, basically because it doesn't meet the criteria necessary for publication (and in some respects I hope it doesn't as that likely means something has gone badly wrong). The more time I spend here the more I realise that there are a lot more people doing this sort of trip than you might think. So, to make a book worth reading (and therefore worth publishing), it needs to be one (or ideally more than one) of the following:
- written by someone famous. Either before the trip (e.g. Ewen McGregor and Charlie Boorman) or afterwards (e.g. Che Guevara);
- written by a talented writer / journalist (e.g. Eric Newby);
- be the first, or longer, or harder (e.g. Ted Simon's Jupiter's Travels) - I've met a motorcyclist who left the UK 6 years ago, cyclists who have spent 2 and a half years cycling the length of the Americas and ridden past someone walking north on the Carratera Austral pulling a trailer heading god knows where. My couple of month bimble round bits of Latin America doesn't really cut it from this perspective;
- have a natural narrative arc, usually involving a crisis of some kind (e.g. 127 hours - I'd rather not have an experience like this, although I do have a sharper knife!).
Notes:
1. When I wrote this I hadn't actually read it, I have now. It's a very well written book and he comes across as a pretty mature person apart from the last couple of paragraphs, but that could well have been written at a later stage (the last part of the book is much more fragmented and significantly less coherent than the rest of the book). There's also no reference to his trip to the USA which he did between leaving Venezuela and returning to Buenos Aires. I'd have been interested to see what his perspective of the USA was and the people he met there, or whether he was as prejudiced as he claimed visitors in the opposite direction were.
No comments:
Post a Comment